It begins, as many shifts do, with silence. No sweeping declarations, no alarm bells, just a series of strategic decisions that start to connect. A thousand roles here, six hundred there, wrapped in corporate language about restructuring, streamlining, or alignment.
But look closer and you’ll see the real cause.
AI is no longer in testing. It is now operational.
This year, Microsoft laid off around 6000 employees across Xbox, LinkedIn, and Azure. Salesforce trimmed roughly 1000 roles. Meta cut 5000. Dell, more than 12000. Google Alphabet, Amazon, IBM, and HP have all followed suit. These are not companies scrambling to cut costs. These are the very firms building the future of AI.
And that’s the story hiding in plain sight.
The companies closest to the heart of the AI revolution are the first to reduce headcount because they see what most still don’t. The productivity curve is no longer linear. It is geometric. An AI-enabled employee can now do the work of five or ten, often faster, often better. What once took a team now takes a tool.
And this is just the first ripple.
The layoffs across tech are not isolated events. They are early signals of a much larger wave that will inevitably reach every vertical, medicine, law, education, research and hospitality. If companies at the frontier of AI are reshaping their workforce today, it would be naive to believe other industries will not follow.
The question is not whether AI will impact your business. The question is what you will do when it does.
For most leaders, the emotional instinct is to view this as a threat. The fear is rational. If AI can turn ten hours of work into one, what happens to the other nine hours. If ten people are replaced by one augmented role, what happens to the rest of the team.
But there is another way to see it. A leadership way.
Imagine you run a business doing one million dollars in annual revenue with a hundred employees. One response is to use AI to cut 90 percent of the team and maintain profitability with ten highly efficient people. Another response is to empower all 100 people with AI, increasing their capability tenfold, and in doing so, scale your business toward a hundred million in output.
The math is the same, but the mindset is not.
AI is not just a cost-saving tool. It is a force multiplier. It is not only about doing things faster. It is about creating things that were not previously possible. Better quality. More innovation. Higher precision. Deeper insights. What leaders must realize is that the real value of AI is not in saving time, but in creating exponential value.
Consider what Adobe did with generative tools in Photoshop. Rather than replacing designers, Adobe gave them superpowers. The result was a new generation of creatives pushing boundaries. Or take McKinsey. Instead of fearing automation, they integrated AI into consulting workflows, allowing junior consultants to model complex scenarios in minutes rather than days, shifting focus from calculation to insight.
The point is not to ignore risk. It is to pursue an advantage. There is no question that this shift will be painful in some sectors. But there is also no question that those who adapt early will own more of the new landscape.
That landscape, by the way, is vast.
Think of this not as changing jobs, but as changing terrain. We are not adjusting the city map. We are moving to a new planet. The first movers, the ones who run farther and faster, get more of the land. This is not metaphor. It is economics. In a world of exponential leverage, early adoption compounds.
It is reminiscent of an old tale, a man on horseback is told he can claim as much land as he can cover in a single day, as long as he returns to the starting point before sunset. The smarter he rides, the more he secures. AI is that horse. And the race has begun.
Small businesses may feel insulated for now, but they should not confuse delay with safety. The technology will touch every sector. The only question is whether you use it to shrink or expand. Cut costs or create markets. Survive or scale.
The AI layoffs are not a glitch in the system. They are the beginning of a redesign. And the real decisions, the ones that matter, are no longer about what AI can do.
They are about what you will choose to do with it.
Leave a Reply